tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3253662469109557251.post3019565942783051753..comments2024-03-13T13:47:58.737-04:00Comments on À bon droit: L'aveu d'une partie qu'elle a reçu une somme d'argent ne constitue pas un commencement de preuve de l'existence d'un contrat de prêt lorsque la partie défenderesse fait valoir qu'il s'agissait d'un donKarim Rennohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10103964289365176023noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3253662469109557251.post-51769344262742681522013-04-02T11:43:41.351-04:002013-04-02T11:43:41.351-04:00With all due respect, that does not appear to be a...With all due respect, that does not appear to be a well founded decesion. The Defendant has a note that states she is remitting, $1,100 (sic), and the loan is for $11,000? Does the court really think there is no commencement of proof? So the Court finds that the Plaintiff GAVE her $11,000?<br />How is that more probable??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com